| From: | Jean-Michel POURE <jm(at)poure(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Raphaël Enrici <blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Package naming conventions |
| Date: | 2003-08-09 20:55:37 |
| Message-ID: | 200308092255.37308.jm@poure.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Saturday 09 August 2003 21:21, Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
> ANYWAY: I am rebuilding betas with pgadmin3-0.9.0-1.rpm and will upload
> them during the night. It will take me some time because I have to rebuild
> wxWindows as well. I missed the information to upgrade to 20030722...
Dear friends,
Raphaël wrote me that the required wxWindows version was 20030707, this is OK
for me. To sum up the RPM thing which differs slightlly from Debian:
1) CVS snapshots are numbered:
pgadmin3-{version}-cvs{date}.rpm
pgadmin3-0.9.0-cvs20030809.rpm
2) FTP uploads are numbered:
pgadmin3-{version}-{build}.rpm
pgadmin3-0.9.0-1.rpm
Build should be 1, 2, 3, etc...
When you release a new {version}, the {build} goes back to 1.
Agreed? On your reply, I will rebuild the packages.
Cheers, Jean-Michel
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2003-08-09 20:57:12 | Re: Package naming conventions |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2003-08-09 20:53:53 | Re: Contributed packages and trust problem ? |