Re: TODO items

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TODO items
Date: 2003-08-08 16:55:02
Message-ID: 200308081655.h78Gt2028909@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Joe,
>
> > They are done (at least the array declarations and array element
> > assignment part):
>
> Way cool! How'd I miss that one?
>
> Time to test ....
>
> > >> o Add PL/PgSQL PROCEDURES that can return multiple values
> > >
> > > Hmmm ... I know how this got on the TODO, but it's a fragment of a larger
> > > suggestion about PROCEDURES vs. FUNCTIONS. I don't think it makes much
> > > sense on its own without the other elements; maybe we should take it off
> > > until I can make a full proposal?
> >
> > Is this somehow different from table functions (SRFs)?
>
> Yes. Reference T-SQL's OUTPUT parameters.
>
> Mind you, with the implementation of SRFs, it's not as necessary as it once
> was.

Do you have TODO to add for this? I removed the original one because,
as worded, it was complete.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2003-08-08 17:01:46 Re: TODO items
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-08-08 16:53:52 Re: TODO items