Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Tuning PostgreSQL

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: "Alexander Priem" <ap(at)cict(dot)nl>,"Roman Fail" <rfail(at)posportal(dot)com>,<shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>,<pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Tuning PostgreSQL
Date: 2003-07-21 16:06:10
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance

> Hmmm. Seems to me that this setup would be better than one RAID5 with three
> 36Gb disks, wouldn't you think so? With one RAID5 array, I would still have
> the data and the WAL on one volume...

Definitely.   As I've said, my experience with RAID5 is that with less than 5 
disks, it performs around 40% of a single scsi disk for large read-write 
operation on Postgres.   

If you have only 3 disks, I'd advocate one disk for WAL and one RAID 1 array 
for the database.

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Vincent van LeeuwenDate: 2003-07-21 16:28:52
Subject: Re: Tuning PostgreSQL
Previous:From: Alexander PriemDate: 2003-07-21 14:00:34
Subject: Re: Tuning PostgreSQL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group