| From: | Ian Barwick <barwick(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jean-Christian Imbeault <jc(at)mega-bucks(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Duplicate key insert question |
| Date: | 2003-07-02 04:34:55 |
| Message-ID: | 200307020634.55147.barwick@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wednesday 02 July 2003 02:58, Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > No, only the "second" one will fail (though it's difficult which one is
> > the second)
>
> From:
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=postgresql-general&m=105656988915991&w=2
>
> Ian Barwick wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> I proposed that same solution 3 years ago. Tom shoots it down:
(This quote is not from Mike Mascari, not me)
> [...]
>
> I couldn't get the link to work so I couldn't read why Tom shot it down.
> But if Tom shot down this idea down ... then it mustn't be correct.
see:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2000-12/msg00970.php
entire thread:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2000-12/msg00947.php
Ian Barwick
barwick(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jean-Christian Imbeault | 2003-07-02 05:15:07 | Performance question |
| Previous Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2003-07-02 03:32:40 | Re: Duplicate key insert question |