Re: Name limitation question

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Name limitation question
Date: 2003-06-25 21:41:41
Message-ID: 200306252141.h5PLffH13929@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice


Added to TODO:

* Allow the identifier length to be increased via a configure
option

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

greg(at)turnstep(dot)com wrote:
[ There is text before PGP section. ]
>
[ PGP not available, raw data follows ]
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> > > Isn't the SQL standard 128 chars?
> >
> > Yes. We tested that a few months ago when we raised the limit from 31
> > to 63, and determined that there was a nontrivial additional speed and
> > space penalty to raising it to 128. Since nobody could muster a
> > real-world use case that actually required 128, we didn't go there.
> > But if you feel you need to check off that particular SQL-compliance
> > box, see NAMEDATALEN in postgres_ext.h.
>
>
> Would it make more sense to put this in as a configure option? It
> might be rarely changed, but it does seem like the right place for it.
>
>
> - --
> Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
> PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200306251101
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html
>
> iD8DBQE++b0LvJuQZxSWSsgRAiMxAKD3GEYVETU++nq6ye4iR8MEsmUBpgCfRngF
> CW1ypGDmDFUsGCEkaTd6+PU=
> =bmFP
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>
[ Decrypting message... End of raw data. ]

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Herbie McDuck 2003-06-26 00:52:57 Which version?
Previous Message Nabil Sayegh 2003-06-25 18:24:59 Re: autotimestamping