From: | "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | scrappy(at)hub(dot)org |
Cc: | pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PHP/PgSQL *and* libpq ... |
Date: | 2003-06-25 12:45:50 |
Message-ID: | 20030625054550.5533.h009.c000.wm@mail.treat.com.criticalpath.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 08:59:41 -0300 (ADT), "Marc G. Fournier" wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Robert Treat wrote:
>
> > Seems like we should also allow for a windows specific distribution of libpq
> > as well.
>
> I thought that the win32 stuff was being included as part of the base
> distribution? IF so, wouldn't such already be included in any
> libpq.tar.gz we created? Is there a reason why we'd need a
> libpq-win.tar.gz (assuming that that is what you are suggesting?) ... ?
>
i'm merely suggesting that a *.tar.gz may not be the best method of distribution
for windows users.
>
>
> >
> > Robert Treat
> >
> > On Tuesday 24 June 2003 10:43 pm, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Added to TODO:
> > >
> > > * Allow creation of a libpq-only tarball
> > >
Robert treat
--
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2003-06-25 12:50:16 | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |
Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2003-06-25 12:24:49 | Re: allowed user/db variables |