Re: PHP/PgSQL *and* libpq ...

From: "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Cc: pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PHP/PgSQL *and* libpq ...
Date: 2003-06-25 12:45:50
Message-ID: 20030625054550.5533.h009.c000.wm@mail.treat.com.criticalpath.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 08:59:41 -0300 (ADT), "Marc G. Fournier" wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Robert Treat wrote:
>
> > Seems like we should also allow for a windows specific distribution of libpq
> > as well.
>
> I thought that the win32 stuff was being included as part of the base
> distribution? IF so, wouldn't such already be included in any
> libpq.tar.gz we created? Is there a reason why we'd need a
> libpq-win.tar.gz (assuming that that is what you are suggesting?) ... ?
>

i'm merely suggesting that a *.tar.gz may not be the best method of distribution
for windows users.

>
>
> >
> > Robert Treat
> >
> > On Tuesday 24 June 2003 10:43 pm, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Added to TODO:
> > >
> > > * Allow creation of a libpq-only tarball
> > >

Robert treat

--
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Pflug 2003-06-25 12:50:16 Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2003-06-25 12:24:49 Re: allowed user/db variables