| From: | Kurt Roeckx <Q(at)ping(dot)be> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ss_family in hba.c |
| Date: | 2003-06-17 20:49:00 |
| Message-ID: | 20030617204900.GA5589@ping.be |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-cygwin pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 03:32:32PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I was looking at this some more and now think there is something wrong
> with the references to ss_family rather than a missing inlcude file.
> Perhaps those were supposed to be references to sa_family or there
> is a missing field from the socket_storage type definition.
The struct sockaddr_storage should only have 1 field you can use
and that is ss_family. The other fields are there just to get
the right size and padding.
Does your system have it's own (broken?) struct sockaddr_storage
maybe?
Kurt
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mike Aubury | 2003-06-17 21:05:06 | Re: ss_family in hba.c |
| Previous Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2003-06-17 20:32:32 | ss_family in hba.c |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oleg Lebedev | 2003-06-17 21:03:38 | Re: Deferrable constraints |
| Previous Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2003-06-17 20:32:32 | ss_family in hba.c |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mike Aubury | 2003-06-17 21:05:06 | Re: ss_family in hba.c |
| Previous Message | Sebastien Lemieux | 2003-06-17 20:36:08 | Extending PostgreSQL in C or C++ |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mike Aubury | 2003-06-17 21:05:06 | Re: ss_family in hba.c |
| Previous Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2003-06-17 20:32:32 | ss_family in hba.c |