Re: Multi-Table Indexes

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Benjamin Minshall <minshall(at)intellicon(dot)biz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Multi-Table Indexes
Date: 2003-06-16 17:28:29
Message-ID: 200306161728.h5GHSTk07462@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Seems multi-table indexes are the only solution for various inheritance
problems, and I seem to remember even a non-inheritance case that could
use it, but I can't remember what it was.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Benjamin Minshall wrote:
> Greetings Hackers-
>
> I have an interest in developing better OO support in PostgreSQL, and have
> done some preliminary research in the archives and TODO list. It appears
> that this topic hasn't gotten much traffic in a while, so I thought I'd test
> the waters. What do the gurus here think of implementing multi-table
> indexes as a vehicle toward better inheritance of keys? Perhaps someone
> here who is more familiar with the code tree can comment on the magnitude of
> this addition.
>
> Thanks,
> -Ben Minshall
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jason Tishler 2003-06-16 17:38:01 Re: [HACKERS] sa_family_t in cygwin compile of cvs + regression failure
Previous Message Bruno Wolff III 2003-06-16 16:47:58 Errors compiling hba.c in current CVS