From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
---|---|
To: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Advocacy and Marketing Mailing List <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Initial draft for our "Code of Ethics and Conduct" |
Date: | 2003-06-14 15:51:29 |
Message-ID: | 20030614155129.GB29302@wolff.to |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 23:27:21 +0800,
Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> - Mentoring at least one new member annually
If this refers to new Marketting/Advocacy members I think this may not
be workable unless a lot of people are leaving the group. Otherwise
it implies that the group must double in size every year for enough people
to be available to be mentored.
> - Tell only and all the truth
What about exceptions for people who have signed NDAs?
> - Abide by the laws and the regulations of the juristiction
Was this supposed to be "their" (instead of "the") juristiction?
I wouldn't want to agree with that (but then I am not really a good
candidate for the advocacy group) as it would rule out civil disobediance
or just ignoring stupid laws.
> - Choose PostgreSQL solutions whenever those meet the needs of the users
I think this is a bad idea. The ethical thing to do is to provide people
with the best soltuion for them taking into account all of their needs.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Clift | 2003-06-14 16:15:43 | Re: Initial draft for our "Code of Ethics and Conduct" |
Previous Message | Justin Clift | 2003-06-14 15:27:21 | Initial draft for our "Code of Ethics and Conduct" |