Re: Which database part 2

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Kaarel <kaarel(at)future(dot)ee>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Which database part 2
Date: 2003-06-14 12:35:15
Message-ID: 20030614123515.GB27374@wolff.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 12:42:35 +0800,
Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
> >Kaarel,
> >
> >
> >>Why did SourceForge.net move from PostgreSQL to DB2?
> >
> >
> >Perhaps because VA Software made a multi-million dollar deal with IBM?
> ><grin>
>
> So this has been transitioned already? The SF.net site has been
> extremely flaky recently (have been trying to do things on it
> extensively in the last few weeks). Wonder if it's transition or DB2
> related?

The change happened quite a while ago. I don't remember exactly, but I
think it was over a year ago.

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nick Fankhauser 2003-06-14 14:40:30 A bit OT- RE: [PERFORM] Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list
Previous Message Jean-Michel POURE 2003-06-14 10:20:27 Re: BakBone PostgreSQL Backup Utility