| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ian Linwood <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] SAP and MySQL ... [and Benchmark] |
| Date: | 2003-06-12 20:57:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20030612205755.GP40542@flake.decibel.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Quite a storm I managed to brew up here... :)
I wasn't trying to insinuate that there was anything wrong with pgsql as
an organization of contributors. I was only suggesting that anyone who
wants to look at a sucessfully run very large open source project take a
look at FBSD.
As others have mentioned, there are probably improvements that could be
made, but then again, there almost always are. Is it worth the
disruption that the change would cause is a better question to ask.
--
Jim C. Nasby (aka Decibel!) jim(at)nasby(dot)net
Member: Triangle Fraternity, Sports Car Club of America
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2003-06-12 21:57:55 | Re: [Fwd: NetVault APM for PostgreSQL] |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-06-12 18:37:44 | Re: [Fwd: NetVault APM for PostgreSQL] |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dmitri Bichko | 2003-06-12 21:24:40 | Re: Best pg_dump practices |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2003-06-12 20:49:01 | Re: Choosing Between PL/PGSQL or C/C++ for Triggers/Store |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-06-12 21:01:05 | Re: CVS -Tip compile issue -- FreeBSD 4.8 |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2003-06-12 19:24:57 | Re: SELECT blocking on ALTER TABLE ADD FOREIGN KEY |