Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II
Date: 2003-06-10 04:43:16
Message-ID: 200306100443.h5A4hGP02913@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Tom, Justin,
>
> > Um, not documenting it is probably not a good move for us, however putting
> > it at the end in a section marked "Developer Focused" or something similar
> > would probably have the right mix of messages. i.e. "hands off" + "not a
> > performance tweak", etc.
>
> So, proposal:
>
> 1) wal_debug and the various trace_locks options will not be included in
> postgresql.conf.sample

Attached is the patch I will apply.

> 2) they will, however, be included in the "Run Time Configuration" page, under
> a secion entitled "Source Develoment Options"

Makes sense, I guess.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/plain 1.8 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-06-10 04:51:49 Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-06-10 04:11:37 Lists are up again