Re: [GENERAL] MySQL gets $19.5 MM

From: Jean-Michel POURE <jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr>
To: <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] MySQL gets $19.5 MM
Date: 2003-06-08 15:50:21
Message-ID: 200306081750.22427.jm.poure@freesurf.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general

Le Mercredi 04 Juin 2003 14:49, Ned Lilly a écrit :
> This, combined with the admittedly weird SAP DB deal, is bad news for
> PostgreSQL. Today, it's clearly the superior product. It will be tomorrow
> too. But Betamax was pretty neat too.
> PostgreSQL needs more corporate support. Case studies are great, but
> someone needs to step into the void that Great Bridge created.

Betamax failed because it was developped by a single company (Sony) on its
own. MySQL do not have a community of developpers. PostgreSQL is a world
community. So why do you say PostgreSQL is going to be the next Betamax?

Furthermore, do you know the "burn-rate" of MySQL (the money spent everyday to
survive)? Answer: probably 19,5 million dollars devided by a few years. And
what will happen when MySQL runs out of fuel?

Cheers,
Jean-Michel

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2003-06-09 14:29:52 Re: [GENERAL] MySQL gets $19.5 MM
Previous Message Roderick A. Anderson 2003-06-06 22:06:45 Re: Techdocs website issues

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Gould 2003-06-08 16:59:33 psqlODBC and Crossover Office 2.0.1
Previous Message Rory Campbell-Lange 2003-06-08 12:03:43 Re: Question about serial vs. int datatypes