From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II |
Date: | 2003-06-07 16:33:10 |
Message-ID: | 200306071633.h57GXA307263@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I think people thought if you were doing SHOW ALL, you were looking for
a specific variable, so alphabetical was best.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Treat wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 11:23, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >
> > 4) Does anyone else have any comments on the proposed re-ordering?
> >
>
> I think this was touched on before, but was there a final determination
> of the ordering of the "show all" command? I'm hoping that will return
> in the new order of the postgresql.conf
>
> Robert Treat
> --
> Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | ohp | 2003-06-07 18:04:28 | security flaw |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-06-07 15:40:45 | Re: Groups and roles |