Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II
Date: 2003-06-07 16:33:10
Message-ID: 200306071633.h57GXA307263@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


I think people thought if you were doing SHOW ALL, you were looking for
a specific variable, so alphabetical was best.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert Treat wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 11:23, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >
> > 4) Does anyone else have any comments on the proposed re-ordering?
> >
>
> I think this was touched on before, but was there a final determination
> of the ordering of the "show all" command? I'm hoping that will return
> in the new order of the postgresql.conf
>
> Robert Treat
> --
> Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ohp 2003-06-07 18:04:28 security flaw
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-06-07 15:40:45 Re: Groups and roles