Re: count syntax

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: count syntax
Date: 2003-05-31 02:51:48
Message-ID: 200305310251.h4V2pmA18200@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Isn't it there already?
> >>
> >> * Whole-row references leak memory
>
> > Oh, OK.
>
> You may have misunderstood me: that's a suggested entry.

Oh, I thought you were quoting from the FAQ. (It didn't sound familiar,
but I figured someone else may have added it.) I searched for 'row' and
couldn't find anything, so TODO added:

* Prevent whole-row references from leaking memory, e.g. SELECT
COUNT(tab.*)

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-05-31 03:07:00 Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-05-31 02:37:36 Re: count syntax