From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: close() vs. closesocket() |
Date: | 2003-04-25 16:03:05 |
Message-ID: | 200304251603.h3PG36V22309@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com wrote:
> >
> > We have never been into abstraction for the sake of abstraction.
>
> Would you say that is a *good* thing or a *bad* thing?
A good thing --- too much abstraction is bad --- look at Mozilla for a
chilling example.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-04-25 16:09:10 | Re: close() vs. closesocket() |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-04-25 15:34:56 | Re: close() vs. closesocket() |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-04-25 16:09:10 | Re: close() vs. closesocket() |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-04-25 15:34:56 | Re: close() vs. closesocket() |