Re: > 16TB worth of data question

From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
To: postgres list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: > 16TB worth of data question
Date: 2003-04-24 19:35:25
Message-ID: 20030424193525.GB8348@libertyrms.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 08:13:50AM -0500, Jeremiah Jahn wrote:

> That's the question...That 2 TB of data is nothing but documents and
> images. I'm under the perception that if that gets parked on a fibre
> channel disk array/ SAN the data will be pretty safe, and the server
> mostly replaceable at that time. Storage is my worry more than
> processing power. I don't think I'm on crack here...?

"Processing power" isn't automatically what server-class hardware
will get you.

You need good ECC memory. You need good disk controllers. You need
to make sure that random flakey garbage hardware will not write
random flakey garbage all over your high quality disk array. Speed
may not be an issue, but reliability really is.

A

--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dennis Gearon 2003-04-24 19:35:49 Re: [SQL] rewriting values with before trigger
Previous Message Erwin Rol 2003-04-24 19:26:19 Re: C++ and v7.3.2