Re: > 16TB worth of data question

FWIW, FreeBSD's UFS filesystem doesn't suffer from the 2G limit. It's
limit is something like 4TB iirc.

I'll also second the opinion that if you're really going to put that
much data in your database, x86 hardware might not be a good idea.
However, I'd recommend RS/6000 over Sun if you can afford it; for
Oracle, the standard is that you only need 1/2 the CPUs in RS/6000 as
you would in a Sun, because RS/6000 puts heavy emphasis on memory
bandwidth.

On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 01:23:55PM -0500, Jeremiah Jahn wrote:
> I have a system that will store about 2TB+ of images per year in a PG
> database. Linux unfortunatly has the 16TB limit for 32bit systems. Not
> really sure what should be done here. Would life better to not store the
> images as BLOBS, and instead come up with some complicated way to only
> store the location in the database, or is there someway to have postgres
> handle this somehow? What are other people out there doing about this
> sort of thing?
>
> thanx,
> -jj-
>
> --
> Jeremiah Jahn <jeremiah(at)cs(dot)earlham(dot)edu>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>

--
Jim C. Nasby (aka Decibel!) jim(at)nasby(dot)net
Member: Triangle Fraternity, Sports Car Club of America
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"