| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Brown <kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") |
| Date: | 2003-04-19 15:33:19 |
| Message-ID: | 200304191533.h3JFXJF01308@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > Great. I think it can be made acceptable with little work.
> >
> > IIRC, the reason Jim's patch got bounced was exactly that it offered an
> > implementation of only one policy, with no possibility of extension.
>
> I read all the comments regarding Jim's patch, but would you mind stating
> exactly what your concern is, Tom? What do you mean by 'one policy'?
As I remember, the patch only put indexes in one place, and tables in
another place. We need a general tablespace solution where we can
create tablespaces and put tables/indexes in any of those.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-19 15:33:31 | Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") |
| Previous Message | mlw | 2003-04-19 13:32:19 | Re: Note about upcoming instability in FE/BE protocol |