Re: Are we losing momentum?

From: "Robert E(dot) Bruccoleri" <bruc(at)stone(dot)congenomics(dot)com>
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane)
Cc: bruc(at)acm(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Are we losing momentum?
Date: 2003-04-16 16:41:09
Message-ID: 200304161641.h3GGf9od052633@stone.congenomics.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dear Tom,
>
> Please keep in mind that I was replying to a poster who said "cross-db
> queries on the same server (meaning same postmaster, for our purposes)
> are trivial; why hasn't Postgres got them when everybody else does?"

My apologies for missing that context.

> Your above arguments are all good ones, but they presume a scenario that
> is much different and *MUCH* harder to implement than local "cross
> database" queries. My point is that schemas solve the same-server
> problems that the original poster was interested in. I did not say,
> nor mean, that there is no need for cross-server queries. But that is
> a different problem. Today we can only offer dblink; maybe someday
> SQL-MED.

Agreed. Thanks. --Bob

+-----------------------------+------------------------------------+
| Robert E. Bruccoleri, Ph.D. | email: bruc(at)acm(dot)org |
| President, Congenomics Inc. | URL: http://www.congen.com/~bruc |
| P.O. Box 314 | Phone: 609 818 7251 |
| Pennington, NJ 08534 | |
+-----------------------------+------------------------------------+

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rob Butler 2003-04-16 16:47:55 Re: Many comments (related to "Are we losing momentum?")
Previous Message Joe Conway 2003-04-16 16:40:55 Re: cross-db queries (was Are we losing momentum?)