On Friday April 11 2003 2:38, Richard Huxton wrote:
> Surely the batching should be happening at the "master" end? That's the
> only place with the context to mark a "determinate state". Batch things
> as fine as you like at that end, and just have the slave process multiple
> batches if it can/wants to.
Huh? I don't understand this comment. How to retrieve properly ordered but
limited batches of transactions and process them on the slave is the
question.
Ed