| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
| Cc: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Win32 defines |
| Date: | 2003-04-05 17:53:11 |
| Message-ID: | 200304051753.h35HrBB14655@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 12:38:51PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Neil Conway wrote:
> >
> > > If we finish the native Win32 port, is there any need to keep the cygwin
> > > stuff around?
> >
> > They do ship PostgreSQL with cygwin, so we may need to keep it around,
> > at least for a few releases, and it isn't that big a port.
>
> Surely there's no need for a less performant, less reliable Cygwin port
> when a native Win32 one is available? If they ship it now, they
> probably won't need to later when the Win32 port is finished. Cygwin is
> already said to be "experimental" or non-commercial quality, AFAIR.
>
> Not that I care though...
I can remove it anytime people want it removed --- maybe once we have
Win32 stabalized and working 100%, we can remove it.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2003-04-05 19:40:01 | Re: Win32 defines |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2003-04-05 17:49:29 | Re: Win32 defines |