Re: Win32 defines

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Win32 defines
Date: 2003-04-05 17:38:51
Message-ID: 200304051738.h35HcpH12958@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Neil Conway wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-04-04 at 15:48, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I am goiing to back off some of these until it is compiled on Win32 ---
> > I am not positive if some of these are cygwin-specific changes and which
> > are Win32 also.
>
> If we finish the native Win32 port, is there any need to keep the cygwin
> stuff around?

They do ship PostgreSQL with cygwin, so we may need to keep it around,
at least for a few releases, and it isn't that big a port.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2003-04-05 17:49:29 Re: Win32 defines
Previous Message Neil Conway 2003-04-05 05:29:29 Re: Win32 defines