From: | Kurt Roeckx <Q(at)ping(dot)be> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Stuff that doesn't work yet in IPv6 patch |
Date: | 2003-04-04 23:34:11 |
Message-ID: | 20030404233411.GA19758@ping.be |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 04:47:45PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> The IPv6 patch seems to still be a few bricks shy of a load. Grepping
> for places that handle AF_INET but not AF_INET6 revealed these
> unimplemented features:
>
> 1. IDENT authorization. Fails if either local or remote address is IPv6.
I've actually written this already.
> 2. SSL. Postmaster allows SSL for AF_INET but not AF_INET6.
Hmm, it really shouldn't matter if it uses AF_INET or AF_INET6
... I should look into that.
> 3. Client address display in backend's ps display seems to be v4 only.
I'll take a look at that too.
> 4. pgstat code can only bind to 127.0.0.1 (v4 loopback). On a v6-only
> machine this would not exist, would it?
I'm not sure, but I think I changed something about that. Can
you point me to that code?
Kurt
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-04 23:37:17 | Re: Stuff that doesn't work yet in IPv6 patch |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-04 23:27:22 | Re: Deadlock while doing VACUUM?? |