| From: | "Ed L(dot)" <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: dbmirror revisions |
| Date: | 2003-04-03 23:57:20 |
| Message-ID: | 200304031657.20395.pgsql@bluepolka.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Thursday April 3 2003 4:37, Ed L. wrote:
>
> AFAICS, there are still at least a few major drawbacks to this approach:
>
> * SEQUENCE objects are not handled; nextval() will not be replicated,
> so sequence objects (and serial columns) between master and slave can
> easily get out of sync. I wonder if eRServer has this same issue?
Clarification: sequence objects for serial columns get out of sync easily,
but the replication maintains correct serial column values.
Ed
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2003-04-04 00:45:20 | Re: SAPdb vs. Postgresql |
| Previous Message | jack | 2003-04-03 23:42:29 | Re: php - postgreSQL link module |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeffrey D. Brower | 2003-04-04 02:43:27 | Re: [HACKERS] OSS database needed for testing |
| Previous Message | Vincent van Leeuwen | 2003-04-03 23:47:40 | Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier |