Re: fairly current mysql v postgresql comparison need for

From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: fairly current mysql v postgresql comparison need for
Date: 2003-03-24 22:18:29
Message-ID: 20030324171829.M26999@mail.libertyrms.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 05:07:00PM -0500, Richard Welty wrote:
> people who turn off these features to gain speed are asking for a world of
> hurt somewhere down the line.

No, they're not. They're planning that there will be some poor
schmoe who'll have to clean up the work ;-) (These are, by the way,
the same folks who are always advocating doing the transaction
management "in the application: it's faster." Mostly, as far as my
experience goes, it's faster because it doesn't work.)

A

--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2003-03-24 22:25:34 Re: [GENERAL] PL/Java (was: stored procedures)
Previous Message Nicolai Petri 2003-03-24 22:12:50 plpgsql and setting array values.