Re: SQL99 ARRAY support proposal

Joe Conway wrote:
> Jason Earl wrote:
> >>Actually, I think it was someone else (Joe???) that is doing the leg
> >>work, and he was the one choosing explode / implode and getting
> >>gruff for it, so I was just stepping in and defending his decision.
> >
> >Oops, my bad. My brain must already think that it is the weekend. My
> >reasoning still stands, though. Whoever writes the code gets to pick
> >the names (assuming, of course, that they can get them past the rest
> >of the PostgreSQL hackers).
>
> <dons flame proof suit>
> Yup, that was me. I was watching from the sidelines ;-)
>
> I'll get on with coding and try to consider all of the input when it
> comes to picking the names. In the end, it will depend on whatever the
> guys with commit access will live with, so I'm not going to worry about
> it too much.
> </dons flame proof suit>

My 2 cents:

Use "split" and "merge". Avoids the "join" issue and avoids the
"implode/explode" issue too. :-)

--
Kevin Brown kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com