Re: I want to send comments to the backend!

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Gerhard Häring <lists(at)ghaering(dot)de>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: I want to send comments to the backend!
Date: 2003-03-20 19:09:26
Message-ID: 200303201909.h2KJ9QU02834@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> generalize it to understand about comments. Right now seems to be a
> >> fine time to think about this, in fact, given that we're hacking the
> >> protocol anyway.
>
> > Yes.
>
> On third thought, though, it would be really trivial for
> pg_exec_query_string to call NullCommand and fall out early if
> pg_parse_query returns an empty list; it'd take one extra test for NIL,
> which would be more than compensated for if we got rid of the strspn
> test. So maybe changing the backend is the best answer after all.

Yes, that was my original thought.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nigel J. Andrews 2003-03-20 21:44:36 Re: Handling Blobs with libpq
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-03-20 19:00:22 Re: I want to send comments to the backend!