| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Gerhard Häring <lists(at)ghaering(dot)de>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: I want to send comments to the backend! |
| Date: | 2003-03-20 17:22:17 |
| Message-ID: | 200303201722.h2KHMH614777@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > It returns PGRES_NONFATAL_ERROR. Why should this be an error?
>
> Actually, you don't get a "res" object at all, because nothing happened.
> The only place in libpq that returns that code is PQresultStatus itself.
Yes, I see that now. res is NULL and PQresultStatus() is returning
PGRES_NONFATAL_ERROR. What is strange is that "" and "\n" both return
an OK result, so I am trying to figure out why comments are different.
> Perhaps PGRES_EMPTY_QUERY would be more appropriate? Not sure where in
> the chain would be best to change the behavior, though.
Yes.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-20 17:30:54 | Re: I want to send comments to the backend! |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-20 16:31:35 | Re: I want to send comments to the backend! |