| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign |
| Date: | 2003-03-20 16:13:16 |
| Message-ID: | 200303201613.h2KGDGJ06549@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > True, but GUC seems like the way to go, and we have per-user/db settings
> > for GUC.
>
> But the required autocommit setting depends neither on the user nor the
> database, it depends on the identity of the client application. That type
> of granularity is not offered by GUC.
True, but the standard also requires autocommit off, so I can imagine
folks wanting it off by default for various users/database.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-03-20 16:17:34 | Re: More outdated examples |
| Previous Message | Larry Rosenman | 2003-03-20 16:12:39 | Re: to_char support for intervals |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steve Howe | 2003-03-20 16:14:06 | Re: I want to send comments to the backend! |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-03-20 16:12:19 | Re: I want to send comments to the backend! |