From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Red Hat snubbed by Oracle |
Date: | 2003-03-18 16:19:47 |
Message-ID: | 200303181619.h2IGJlB27686@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Oracle is now providing higher level support for United Linux than for
> > Red Hat Linux:
> > http://www.silicon.com/news/500011/1/3315.html
>
> I don't see where in that you read that Oracle is offering a *higher*
> level of support on UnitedLinux. It looks less to me than what they
> currently do with Red Hat. Still, you are right that any support for
> other Linux distros besides Red Hat won't make RH happy ...
You are right --- it wasn't clear how United Linux support is any
_better_ than for Red Hat. They talked about "Level 3 support" but
didn't say what the level was for Red Hat.
The News Forge comments also asked this question:
http://newsvac.newsforge.com/newsvac/03/03/17/1610236.shtml?tid=3
I also came across an interesting article about Oracle's Linux guy:
http://news.com.com/2008-1001-992907.html?tag=fd_nc_1
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thiago Lima | 2003-03-18 16:58:40 | Vacuum, slowqueries e tabe optimization |
Previous Message | Dennis Gearon | 2003-03-18 16:15:43 | Re: Causes an insert into a table with a unique column |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-03-18 16:56:51 | Re: cursors outside transactions |
Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar<shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in> | 2003-03-18 15:00:16 | Re: Primary key and references |