Re: Red Hat snubbed by Oracle

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Red Hat snubbed by Oracle
Date: 2003-03-18 16:19:47
Message-ID: 200303181619.h2IGJlB27686@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Oracle is now providing higher level support for United Linux than for
> > Red Hat Linux:
> > http://www.silicon.com/news/500011/1/3315.html
>
> I don't see where in that you read that Oracle is offering a *higher*
> level of support on UnitedLinux. It looks less to me than what they
> currently do with Red Hat. Still, you are right that any support for
> other Linux distros besides Red Hat won't make RH happy ...

You are right --- it wasn't clear how United Linux support is any
_better_ than for Red Hat. They talked about "Level 3 support" but
didn't say what the level was for Red Hat.

The News Forge comments also asked this question:

http://newsvac.newsforge.com/newsvac/03/03/17/1610236.shtml?tid=3

I also came across an interesting article about Oracle's Linux guy:

http://news.com.com/2008-1001-992907.html?tag=fd_nc_1

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thiago Lima 2003-03-18 16:58:40 Vacuum, slowqueries e tabe optimization
Previous Message Dennis Gearon 2003-03-18 16:15:43 Re: Causes an insert into a table with a unique column

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-03-18 16:56:51 Re: cursors outside transactions
Previous Message Shridhar Daithankar<shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in> 2003-03-18 15:00:16 Re: Primary key and references