Re: Bug #890: only one user per process in libpq with krb5 auth

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ed Schaller <schallee(at)darkmist(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug #890: only one user per process in libpq with krb5 auth
Date: 2003-03-18 01:49:09
Message-ID: 200303180149.h2I1n9v11971@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs


I don't think any of that has changed, if that is what you are asking.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ed Schaller wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> > OK, please let me know. Thanks.
>
> I haven't taken the time to check the current state of the
> authentication code and am relying on my old work on it. Would it be
> worth me taking the time to try to rework it in a better manner?
>
> >>>------>
>
> --
>
> +-------------+-----------------------+---------------+
> | Ed Schaller | Dark Mist Networking | psuedoshroom |
> +-------------+-----------------------+---------------+
-- End of PGP section, PGP failed!

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sean Reifschneider 2003-03-18 07:18:41 Re: Problem with RULE to update tables
Previous Message Ed Schaller 2003-03-18 01:44:35 Re: Bug #890: only one user per process in libpq with krb5 auth