| From: | "Jeroen T(dot) Vermeulen" <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psql patch |
| Date: | 2003-02-25 15:42:30 |
| Message-ID: | 20030225154230.GD97238@xs4all.nl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 01:35:15PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Cool; if you can do it that way then the wasted-cycles objection is
> gone. (I don't think it would have been very interesting to implement
> the functionality only in the no-readline case, 'cuz just about everyone
> seems to use readline builds.)
OK. I'm attaching my new patch (which is fixed for the bug in the
previous attempt, and now touches a lot more code).
After this, I'll get to work on introducing select(), and once that's
finished we can start experimenting with asynchronous notification
reports.
Jeroen
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| psql.patch | text/plain | 21.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | reece | 2003-02-25 19:44:40 | psql \pset pager always for 7.3.2 (patch) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-02-25 14:35:58 | Re: performance: use pread instead of lseek+read |