| From: | "Jeroen T(dot) Vermeulen" <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psql patch |
| Date: | 2003-02-24 17:27:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20030224172757.GD97071@xs4all.nl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 02:32:47PM +0000, Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
>
> Wouldn't it make sense to have a separate utility for this? Something like
> pg_listen? Configuration of the conditions could simply be by command line
> switches ( or even just pg_listen <condition> [<condition> ...] ). Perhaps it's
> a gborg or contrib utility rather than core though.
Sure, but would it be as practical as having an interactive shell where
you could add or remove triggers on the fly and manipulate your database?
Chances are, if you need the one you're going to need the other as well,
with the same connect strings and in similar shell windows.
Jeroen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-02-24 17:36:56 | Re: psql patch |
| Previous Message | Jeroen T. Vermeulen | 2003-02-24 17:25:52 | Re: psql patch |