Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres: [Viruschecked]

From: "Patric Bechtel" <bechtel(at)ipcon(dot)de>
To: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres: [Viruschecked]
Date: 2003-02-20 17:05:14
Message-ID: 20030220170540.D622A475B47@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 09:02:06 -0700 (MST), scott.marlowe wrote:

Hi,

I doubt that it will be for "super-price-conscious" only. I recently
saw Western Digital annoucing a 10.000 RPM drive with 36 Gig for
serial ATA, <5.2ms access time, about 55 MB/s, for 30% than the SCSI price.
That's serious. Together with 5 years warranty and explicit statement
about being 24x7x365 capable (which most ATA-drives aren't!).

0.02$...

Patric

>> I'd see Serial ATA being a "serious challenger" if it allowed you to
>> cheaply build some "embarrassingly-parallel" RAID servers where you
>> were able to get 16 drives hooked up, each on its own ATA 'bus' for
>> about the price of 4-way SCSI.
>>
>> But the intended market is doubtless the super-price-conscious market,
>> which naturally leads to the overall quality of the results being
>> pretty compromised.

>These guys:

>http://www.ide-raid.com/

>will probably make use of serial ata, since they're already making some
>very nice, very fast IDE based RAID devices, and very dense (12 disk 3U
>units.)

PGP Public Key Fingerprint: 2636 F26E F523 7D62 4377 D206 7C68 06BB

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guy Fraser 2003-02-20 17:07:01 Re: arrays and pl/pgsql?
Previous Message Henrik Steffen 2003-02-20 17:03:40 reindex vs. drop index , create index