Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: The last configuration file patch (I hope!) This one

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: mlw <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org,pgsql-patchesr(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The last configuration file patch (I hope!) This one
Date: 2003-02-19 21:53:49
Message-ID: 200302192153.h1JLrnA14845@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
mlw wrote:
> >I raised the possibility of moving the pid file only last week.  Tom
> >pointed out that it acts as a lock on the database to prevent two
> >postmasters' trying to manage the same database.  As such it should NOT
> >be a configurable parameter.
> >
> This is a different PID file. Sorry, this one is specifically for FHS 
> systems. The postmaster.pid file, as used by PostgreSQL remains in the 
> data directory.

Uh, how does this work if you don't do an FHS install --- where does it
put this FHS postmaster.pid file?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tilo SchwarzDate: 2003-02-19 22:22:44
Subject: Re: Changing the default configuration (was Re: [pgsql-advocacy]
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2003-02-19 20:30:40
Subject: psql regression in CVS HEAD

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: mlwDate: 2003-02-19 23:27:47
Subject: Re: The last configuration file patch (I hope!) This one
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-02-19 21:37:50
Subject: Re: pg_avd

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group