Re: Still a bug in the VACUUM ??? !!!

From: Andreas Schmitz <a(dot)schmitz(at)cityweb(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Still a bug in the VACUUM ??? !!!
Date: 2003-02-15 11:51:09
Message-ID: 200302151251.09162.a.schmitz@cityweb.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers

On Friday 14 February 2003 17:55, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andreas Schmitz <a(dot)schmitz(at)cityweb(dot)de> writes:
> > I have a problem with the "vacuum full". every time I run the vacuum
> > command I loose data from the parent tables. maybe also from the
> > subtables (haven't checked yet). I tried it a few times up to now an I
> > can reproduce the phenomena.
>
> That sounds ugly ... but are you sure you don't have a hardware problem?
> I don't think anyone's ever reported such behavior before.
>
> If it is a Postgres bug, we can't do much to help you without a lot more
> detail.
>
> regards, tom lane

hi,

it does sound ugly. I checked the hardware. I can't see any problems with it.
I know, somestimes you need a lot of luck to see a CPU problem under solaris.
But I think the hardware is ok. however, what kind of details do you need to
qualify if it's a postgres problem or not ?

regards

-andreas schmitz

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message daniel alvarez 2003-02-15 13:14:42 Re: Still a bug in the VACUUM ??? !!!
Previous Message Pius Chan 2003-02-14 21:16:16 pg_restore fails when restoring a database view

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message daniel alvarez 2003-02-15 13:14:42 Re: Still a bug in the VACUUM ??? !!!
Previous Message Curt Sampson 2003-02-15 08:36:39 Re: [HACKERS] More benchmarking of wal_buffers