Re: PostgreSQL x Oracle

From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL x Oracle
Date: 2003-02-10 15:58:01
Message-ID: 20030210105801.E26539@mail.libertyrms.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 03:40:02PM +0100, Fabrizio Ermini wrote:
> On 9 Feb 2003 at 17:48, Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
>
> > also I heard that you cant do transaction within transaction in postgres
> > while in Oracle you can. ( im not sure if its true at all )
>
> nope... "commit" in Oracle close ALL open transaction.

I suspect the point is really that an error inside a transaction in
Oracle doesn't force you to roll back to the very beginning. I
believe this is listed as "savepoints" in the current TODO.

Which reminds me of another feature PostgreSQL has. You can buy an
awful lot of _very talented_ developer time with the fees you'd just
to use stock Oracle. I don't know why more companies (and to date I
have to include my own employer in this category) don't spend just a
little of that savings on PostgreSQL development.

A

--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2003-02-10 16:03:58 Re: Not finding local variables and libs
Previous Message ahoward 2003-02-10 15:54:05 Re: PostgreSQL x Oracle