Re: PGP signing releases

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PGP signing releases
Date: 2003-02-03 02:40:25
Message-ID: 200302022140.25248.lamar.owen@wgcr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sunday 02 February 2003 21:23, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Neil Conway wrote:
> > I think we should PGP sign all the "official" packages that are provided
> > for download from the various mirror sites. IMHO, this is important
> > because:

> right, that is why we started to provide md5 checksums ...

Actually this impacts RPMs more than the tarball, although the tarball's md5
sums are important. I have been intending to do this for some time; maybe
it's time to bite the bullet.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Clift 2003-02-03 02:53:15 Re: Last call for 7.3.2
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-02-03 02:23:14 Re: PGP signing releases