| From: | Francisco J Reyes <fran(at)natserv(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Christoph Dalitz <christoph(dot)dalitz(at)hs-niederrhein(dot)de>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PG Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Status of tablespaces |
| Date: | 2003-01-28 16:24:45 |
| Message-ID: | 20030128112047.T57135-100000@zoraida.natserv.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, what I envision is only a cleaner reimplementation of the
> existing LOCATION facility: the DBA will be able to designate certain
> directories as tablespaces and then assign individual tables, indexes,
> etc to particular tablespaces.
After reading your post went out to look for the LOCATION facility. Is
that "create <DB> wit location".
Definitely a step forward, but doesn't help with large databases.
I also wonder if the syntax of the current create DB won't have to be
changed once tablespaces are created.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Cave-Ayland | 2003-01-28 16:28:20 | Re: Ref to last INSERT on a table without OIDs? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-01-28 16:20:33 | Re: Status of tablespaces |