Re: Using RSYNC for replication?

From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Using RSYNC for replication?
Date: 2003-01-28 14:07:04
Message-ID: 20030128090704.D22543@mail.libertyrms.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 08:58:09AM -0500, Jason Hihn wrote:
> 2)I can assure myself that there are no existing open transactions.
> Also, this is the reason why I'd lock all the tables. My call for locks
> would block until all other transactions were complete, ensuring I get a
> consistant copy.

No, it won't.
<http://www.ca.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.3/postgres/backup-file.html>:

"The database server _must_ be shut down in order to get a usable
backup. Half-way measures such as disallowing all connections will
not work as there is always some buffering going on."

If you want to minimise the amount of traffic you send to your
backup, I suggest looking into some form of replication. There is a
pile of information on replication at
<http://gborg.postgresql.org/genpage?replication_research>

A

--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message William WAISSE 2003-01-28 14:07:19 Re: list server problems?
Previous Message Jason Hihn 2003-01-28 13:58:09 Re: Using RSYNC for replication?