Re: v7.3.1 psql against a v7.2.x database ...

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: v7.3.1 psql against a v7.2.x database ...
Date: 2003-01-11 08:34:01
Message-ID: 20030111043220.I13366@hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Lamar Owen wrote:

> On Friday 10 January 2003 23:50, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > That was the aspect I feared ... almost an argument in itself for why psql
> > should be in gborg as a seperate project ;)
>
> You've got to be kidding. The main command-line interface NEEDS to be
> part of the main package.

Needs to be *packaged* with the main package for a release, but there is
no reason why it can't have its own release cycle between relesaes ...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-01-11 09:46:37 pg_rules view
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-01-11 07:19:35 Re: help with PL/PgSQL bug