Re: python interface

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: python interface
Date: 2003-01-08 15:16:55
Message-ID: 200301081516.h08FGtL18275@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> On Saturday 04 January 2003 19:58, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > Let me know how it goes, and what the project is ... that way we can move
> > the current CVS over so that we don't lose the extensive logging history
>
> Hmm. I didn't think that it was suggested to move the repository again. I
> thought I was just going to add a pointer to the PyGreSQL page but leave the
> code where it was. If we move it won't it make it harder to add it with just
> a config option like we do now?

Yes, it will make it harder, but we can release independently, and
others may get more involved in it. We have moved the CVS for most of
the interfaces, and they are doing fine on gborg.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-01-08 17:03:45 Re: Read-only transactions
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-01-08 14:59:56 ODBC fix

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeroen T. Vermeulen 2003-01-08 17:30:29 Re: libpqxx Large Objects
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-01-08 14:59:56 ODBC fix