Re: OS/400 support?

From: cbbrowne(at)cbbrowne(dot)com
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: OS/400 support?
Date: 2003-01-07 01:52:32
Message-ID: 20030107015232.4500449307@cbbrowne.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

In an attempt to throw the authorities off his trail, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane) transmitted:
> Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>> We don't support OS/400 yet do we?
>
> Never heard of it. Is it Unix-y? Do you have one available for testing?

No, OS/400 is what replaced IBM System 34, System 36, and System 38.
(Apparently they jumped to 40, and then multiplied by 10 to suggest it
was 10x as good...)

It was based on the CMU "Hydra" project, which built an OS with a pretty
strong security kernel, with ties to the "orthogonal persistence"
notion.

By this point, they have created a POSIX-emulation environment so it can
pretend to be somewhat like a Unix, but underneath, it's a database
system for running RPG code. As such, it kind of starts as a DBMS.

Somehow, I'm not sure that PostgreSQL-on-OS/400 is likely to be more
than a curiosity.
--
(reverse (concatenate 'string "moc.enworbbc@" "enworbbc"))
http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/rdbms.html
If you can't see the bright side of things, polish the dark side...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Sherry 2003-01-07 01:55:52 Re: OS/400 support?
Previous Message Dan Langille 2003-01-07 01:51:48 Re: OS/400 support?