Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: innodb

From: Thorsten Haude <postgresql(at)thorstenhau(dot)de>
To: "'PGSQL Novice List'" <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: innodb
Date: 2002-12-30 10:05:06
Message-ID: 20021230100506.GG981@eumel.yoo.local (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-novice

* Reshat Sabiq <sabiq(at)purdue(dot)edu> [2002-12-30 10:49]:
>I saw on a website an advice, that for features like referential
>integrity etc. postgres tables need to be of type Innodb. Isn't innodb
>something that MySQL needs. 

Referentials work just fine without any new table type, and yes,
InnoDB is something I heard in connection with MySQL.

Don't visit that website again for advice.

>I've been assuming that the advanced nice features (transactions, etc.)
>are built-in in postgres and are enabled by default. Am I right?

I sure hope so.

Golly, I'd hate to have a kid like me!
    - Calvin

In response to

  • innodb at 2002-12-30 09:49:26 from Reshat Sabiq

pgsql-novice by date

Next:From: Cheryl ThompsonDate: 2002-12-31 16:50:31
Subject: Wading My Way through the Wrox Book-- have a few questions
Previous:From: Reshat SabiqDate: 2002-12-30 09:49:26
Subject: innodb

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group