| From: | Thorsten Haude <postgresql(at)thorstenhau(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'PGSQL Novice List'" <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: innodb |
| Date: | 2002-12-30 10:05:06 |
| Message-ID: | 20021230100506.GG981@eumel.yoo.local |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-novice |
Hi,
* Reshat Sabiq <sabiq(at)purdue(dot)edu> [2002-12-30 10:49]:
>I saw on a website an advice, that for features like referential
>integrity etc. postgres tables need to be of type Innodb. Isn't innodb
>something that MySQL needs.
Referentials work just fine without any new table type, and yes,
InnoDB is something I heard in connection with MySQL.
Don't visit that website again for advice.
>I've been assuming that the advanced nice features (transactions, etc.)
>are built-in in postgres and are enabled by default. Am I right?
I sure hope so.
Thorsten
--
Golly, I'd hate to have a kid like me!
- Calvin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Cheryl Thompson | 2002-12-31 16:50:31 | Wading My Way through the Wrox Book-- have a few questions |
| Previous Message | Reshat Sabiq | 2002-12-30 09:49:26 | innodb |