From: | Klaus Sonnenleiter <klaus(at)sonnenleiter(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "shreedhar" <shreedhar(at)lucidindia(dot)net>, "Postgres" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: Is there any eqvivalent or alternative to UPDATE(column)orCOLUMNS_UPDATED() of SQLServer2000 |
Date: | 2002-12-27 09:26:41 |
Message-ID: | 200212270426.41557.klaus@sonnenleiter.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Sreedhar,
From looking at the documentation at postgresql.org, it seems like this syntax
is not supported. The compatibility description in the create trigger docs
indicates that BEFORE UPDATE OF col_name is not supported either which
probably means that Postgres has no knowledge of the statement that fired the
trigger.
Klaus
On Friday 27 December 2002 12:53, shreedhar wrote:
> Dear Momjian,
>
> I need solution for the problem stated in subject. (i.e.) any method to
> know whether a record is Previously updated or not ?
>
> Sreedhar
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
> To: "shreedhar" <shreedhar(at)lucidindia(dot)net>
> Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 10:41 AM
> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Is there any eqvivalent or alternative to
> UPDATE(column)orCOLUMNS_UPDATED() of SQLServer2000
>
> > Sure. As root, use the 'date' command to fix it.
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >-
>
> -
>
> > shreedhar wrote:
> > > Sorry,
> > >
> > > Because it is some problem in my system. So, it has shown Fri, 15 Mar
>
> 2002
>
> > > 17:27:30 +0530.
> > >
> > > Kindly any body give solution to my problem.
> > >
> > > Sreedhar.
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
> > > To: "shreedhar" <shreedhar(at)lucidindia(dot)net>
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2002 11:03 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Is there any eqvivalent or alternative to
> > > UPDATE(column)or COLUMNS_UPDATED() of SQLServer2000
> > >
> > > > Your email is dated:
> > > >
> > > > Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 17:27:30 +0530
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >-
> >
> > > -
> > >
> > > > shreedhar wrote:
> > > > > Is there any eqvivalent or alternative to the following IF
> > >
> > > UPDATE(column) or
> > >
> > > > > IF(COLUMNS_UPDATED()) of SQLServer2000.
> > > > >
> > > > > IF UPDATE (column)
> > > > >
> > > > > Tests for an INSERT or UPDATE action to a specified column and is
>
> not
>
> > > used
> > >
> > > > > with DELETE operations. More than one column can be specified.
>
> Because
>
> > > the
> > >
> > > > > table name is specified in the ON clause, do not include the table
>
> name
>
> > > > > before the column name in an IF UPDATE clause. To test for an
> > > > > INSERT
>
> or
>
> > > > > UPDATE action for more than one column, specify a separate
> > >
> > > UPDATE(column)
> > >
> > > > > clause following the first one. IF UPDATE will return the TRUE
> > > > > value
>
> in
>
> > > > > INSERT actions because the columns have either explicit values or
> > >
> > > implicit
> > >
> > > > > (NULL) values inserted.
> > > > >
> > > > > IF (COLUMNS_UPDATED())
> > > > >
> > > > > Tests, in an INSERT or UPDATE trigger only, whether the mentioned
>
> column
>
> > > or
> > >
> > > > > columns were inserted or updated. COLUMNS_UPDATED returns a
>
> varbinary
>
> > > bit
> > >
> > > > > pattern that indicates which columns in the table were inserted or
> > >
> > > updated.
> > >
> > > > > Thanks And Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Sreedhar
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > "Faith, faith, faith in ourselves, faith, faith in God, this is the
> > >
> > > secret
> > >
> > > > > of greatness.
> > > > > If you have faith in all the three hundred and thirty millions of
>
> your
>
> > > > > mythological gods,
> > > > > and in all the gods which foreigners have now and again introduced
>
> into
>
> > > your
> > >
> > > > > midst,
> > > > > and still have no faith in yourselves, there is no salvation for
>
> you. "
>
> > > > > (III. 190)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ---------------------------(end of
>
> broadcast)---------------------------
>
> > > > > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> > > > pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
> > > > + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
> > > > + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
> > > > Pennsylvania
> > >
> > > 19073
> >
> > --
> > Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> > pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
> > + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
> > + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania
>
> 19073
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Schmitz | 2002-12-27 14:37:19 | dbsize |
Previous Message | shreedhar | 2002-12-27 05:53:38 | Re: Is there any eqvivalent or alternative to UPDATE(column)orCOLUMNS_UPDATED() of SQLServer2000 |