| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | raanders(at)acm(dot)org, "" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Update on replication |
| Date: | 2002-12-18 01:38:26 |
| Message-ID: | 20021217213740.S63985-100000@hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > I just got my copy of SysAdmin Magazine and was surprised to see an
> > article about Usogres -- The PostgreSQL Replication Tool.
> >
> > I don't remember seeing it mentioned on this or the General list. Though
> > I just started reading the article and don't have a firm grasp on it yet,
> > I do remember a discussion of replication using this technique - described
> > in the first two paragraphs.
>
> Glad to hear that. Usogres was developed in Japan and pretty popular
> ammong Japanese PostgreSQL community.
>
> BTW, there is a commercial product called QueryMaster, which takes
> similar approach to Usogres. It copies the input query and distribute
> to multiple PostgreSQL servers. As long as one of a server is working,
> users even do not notice some of them are failing.
How come these solutions are such well kept secrets? I've heard of
neither in relation to past discussions about replication, or have I just
missed them? :(
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Copeland | 2002-12-18 01:43:05 | Re: Update on replication |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2002-12-18 01:13:06 | Re: Update on replication |