Re: Suggestion; "WITH VACUUM" option

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Suggestion; "WITH VACUUM" option
Date: 2002-12-16 22:25:59
Message-ID: 200212161425.59402.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Marc,

> > Easy? Hard? Insane? What do you think?
>
> Just curious, but wouldn't it be just as simple to issue a VACUUM call
> right after the UPDATE/DELETE?

Well, you can't do that as part of a transaction or procedure, whereas ....

Hmmm. Couldn't do "with vacuum" as part of a transaction, either.

Funny, it sounded like a really good idea on the phone.

In the words of Rosanne Rosanna Danna,
"Neeeveeeeeer miiiiiiiiind."

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Iavor Raytchev 2002-12-16 22:28:01 pgaccess 0.98.8 - released
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2002-12-16 22:15:32 Re: Suggestion; "WITH VACUUM" option