Re: Postgresql -- initial impressions and comments

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: "j(dot)random(dot)programmer" <javadesigner(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql -- initial impressions and comments
Date: 2002-12-03 21:19:01
Message-ID: 20021203211901.GA15415@wolff.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 18:44:03 -0800,
"j.random.programmer" <javadesigner(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
>
> 4) The auto-increment ("serial") fields are very
> badly documented.
>
> Normally, I want to say something like:
>
> INSERT into foo values (null, 'a', 'b',...)
>
> where the first field is defined as serial. However
> I can't send null to that field and expect it to be
> auto incremented - I have to either list out my
> fields in the statment (and omit the serial field):

Use the keyword DEFAULT instead of NULL.

> 5) There is no way to grant permissions on all tables
> within a database to some user. You have to grant
> permissions on each table one-by-one. What I want
> to do (and mysql allows this) is something like:
>
> GRANT ALL on foodb.* to user_bar;

You can get the list of tables from the system catalog and then issue
grant statements for them. You could write a function to do this,
do it in an application or write sql query output to a script which
you then execute.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2002-12-03 21:21:31 Re: getting query result into a file
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2002-12-03 21:18:38 Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces